Effects of modafinil on electroencephalographic microstates in healthy adults.

RATIONALE: Modafinil has been proposed as a potentially effective clinical treatment for neuropsychiatric disorders characterized by cognitive control deficits. However, the precise effects of modafinil, particularly on brain network functions, are not completely understood. OBJECTIVES: To address this gap, we examined the effects of modafinil on resting-state brain activity in 30 healthy adults using microstate analysis. Electroencephalographic (EEG) microstates are discrete voltage topographies generated from resting-state network activity. METHODS: Using a placebo-controlled, within-subjects design, we examined changes to microstate parameters following placebo (0 mg), low (100 mg), and high (200 mg) modafinil doses. We also examined the functional significance of these microstates via associations between microstate parameters and event-related potential indexes of conflict monitoring and automatic error processing (N2 and error-related negativity) and behavioral responses (accuracy and RT) from a subsequent flanker interference task. RESULTS: Five microstates emerged following each treatment condition, including four canonical microstates (A-D). Modafinil increased microstate C proportion and occurrence regardless of dose, relative to placebo. Modafinil also decreased microstate A proportion and microstate B proportion and occurrence relative to placebo. These modafinil-related changes in microstate parameters were not associated with similar changes in flanker ERPs or behavior. Finally, modafinil made transitions between microstates A and B less likely and transitions from A and B to C more likely. CONCLUSIONS: Previous fMRI work has correlated microstates A and B with auditory and visual networks and microstate C with a salience network. Thus, our results suggest modafinil may deactivate large-scale sensory networks in favor of a higher order functional network during resting-state in healthy adults.

Error-related Alpha Suppression: Scalp Topography and (Lack of) Modulation by Modafinil.

Errors in performance trigger cognitive and neural changes that are implemented to adaptively adjust to fluctuating demands. Error-related alpha suppression (ERAS)-which refers to decreased power in the alpha frequency band after an incorrect response-is thought to reflect cognitive arousal after errors. Much of this work has been correlational, however, and there are no direct investigations into its pharmacological sensitivity. In Study 1 (n = 61), we evaluated the presence and scalp distribution of ERAS in a novel flanker task specifically developed for cross-species assessments. Using this same task in Study 2 (n = 26), which had a placebo-controlled within-subject design, we evaluated the sensitivity of ERAS to placebo (0 mg), low (100 mg), and high (200 mg) doses of modafinil, a wakefulness promoting agent. Consistent with previous work, ERAS was maximal at parieto-occipital recording sites in both studies. In Study 2, modafinil did not have strong effects on ERAS (a significant Accuracy × Dose interaction emerged, but drug-placebo differences did not reach statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons and was absent after controlling for accuracy rate). ERAS was correlated with accuracy rates in both studies. Thus, modafinil did not impact ERAS as hypothesized, and findings indicate ERAS may reflect an orienting response to infrequent events.

Potentiated perceptual neural responses to learned threat during Pavlovian fear acquisition and extinction in adolescents.

Adolescents' experience of heightened anxiety and increased vulnerability to develop anxiety disorders is believed to partly result from blunted fear extinction processes. However, whether this anxiety is mediated by adolescent-specific differences in perceptual responses to learned threat is not known. To investigate this, we used EEG to examine reinforcement-dependent changes in early visual event-related potentials in adolescents (N = 28, 13-14 years) and adults (N = 23, 25-26 years old) during a differential Pavlovian fear conditioning task, with one conditioned stimulus (CS+) paired with an aversive sound (unconditioned stimulus [US]) on 50% of trials, and another (CS-) never paired with the US. An immediate extinction phase followed, where both CSs were presented alone. We found age-dependent dissociations between explicit and implicit measures of fear learning. Specifically, both adolescents and adults demonstrated successful fear conditioning and extinction according to their explicit awareness of changes in CS contingencies and their evaluative CS ratings, and their differential skin conductance responses. However, for the first time we show age differences at the neural level in perceptual areas. Only adolescents showed greater visual P1 and N1 responses to the CS+ compared to the CS- during acquisition, a dissociation that for the N1 was maintained during extinction. We suggest that the adolescent perceptual hyper-responsivity to learned threat and blunted extinction reported here could be an adaptive mechanism to protect adolescents from harm. However, this hyper-responsivity may also confer greater vulnerability to experience pathological levels of anxiety at this developmental stage.

Neural and behavioral measures suggest that cognitive and affective functioning interactions mediate risk for psychosis-proneness symptoms in youth with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Behavioral components of chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q), caused by the most common human microdeletion, include cognitive and adaptive functioning impairments, heightened anxiety, and an elevated risk of schizophrenia. We investigated how interactions between executive function and the largely overlooked factor of emotion regulation might relate to the incidence of symptoms of psychotic thinking in youth with 22q. We measured neural activity with event-related potentials (ERPs) in variants of an inhibitory function (Go/No-Go) experimental paradigm that presented affective or non-affective stimuli. The study replicated inhibition impairments in the 22q group that were amplified in the presence of stimuli with negative, more than positive affective salience. Importantly, the anterior N2 conflict monitoring ERP significantly increased when youth with 22q viewed angry and happy facial expressions, unlike the typically developing participants. This suggests that youth with 22q may require greater conflict monitoring resources when controlling their behavior in response to highly salient social signals. This evidence of both behavioral and neurophysiological differences in affectively influenced inhibitory function suggests that frequently anxious youth with 22q may struggle more with cognitive control in emotionally charged social settings, which could influence their risk of developing symptoms of psychosis.